Politics? Or just a bit of fun.

What works in one country has not fully worked in another. The variables are endless too many to mention here. I would like to address some simple considerations in today’s entry and clear up a few things. Today I am making a quick stream of consciousness about democracy, I invite you to continue with the conversations below. So here goes with some thoughts about politics and other bits of fun in relation to democracy and other peaceful matters.

For some reason I make the connection between politics and democracy and hold local politicians directly responsible for peace in the valley, so does this reinforce the idea your vote matters? In a democratic context yes, every vote counts, but when the vote is based on your own suggestions around the time of voting the thread gets a lot thinner.

How is this sort of political area measured? Imagine the wheel and tape measure going around the field measuring the circumference. Land mass in a field does not change, so why measure the same data in the field. Now take a look at voting, you vote for someone of something at a local level, all the candidates at the local level come across as an unexpected surprise. Its difficult to make out any difference between candidates and ministers. The interesting thing is candidates have faith in themselves and imply on leaflets what they believe in. The beliefs are I hope based on a true representation of who they are.

There are local faces you should recognise passing you by on the high street where you live, so voting should be like a fancy dress contest, this is a peaceful way of looking at the ballet box. Voting is not just one vote though is it, there is a first second and third place. Each candidate already has a colour creating colour bias and draws upon the success of The popular contest Crufts.

If the eye is drawn to the colour blue, when the doorbell rings you could vote for the blue like you always do, same goes for red. Its easy to undermine the colour green but people by in large, moreso now like the colour green. The thing is you cannot measure enough information to make a decision best suiting your area simply by colour. Political campaigns gather momentum from feedback and financial contributions of donors. This week in the news there has been a lot of names mentioned of donations made to people. Which is not very nice, especially when like the vote donations are made anonymously.

Democracy needs some defining before I continue. I invite you to share knowledge on what you know about democracy below, I hope to follow up on this post and continue these thoughts shortly. As I say leave some leisurely thoughts below.


WordCamp US

Reactions, distractions, fears and tears

For every message we make, there has to be some sort of forethought. There are so many ways reactions take place, understanding who you are talking to helps, finding out who you are talking to is not all that easy. I could share with you some ways to find out more about your readers probably on someone else’s blog. If I get chance I will add these links into this post. Messages require calm reactions, if you are using images be sure to explain the reason behind confusing photographs. Right now due to the amount of reactions, distractions a lot I imagine of unfocused people are very sensitive right now. A lack of focus can come to anyone, so the temptation to follow other people is always there its a lot easier than focusing and there are a lot of creative people out there. Everyone love creativity and being creative by answering problems of the world, if you share these fears you will be less prone to the emotion welt up. Its a hard biscuit to crunch. On your own you are alone, in a tribe or congregation you are not alone and the sense of being part of a force marching only makes you stronger inside or outside the house. Having a conscious contact with god helps people and I understand getting closer to god comes through studying recommended text which requires an example of a regular contact with faith, that is a test and an ability to understand a reel back what has been understood. I here am not asking for any affirmations of your understanding of faith and am not asking you to raise your hand and agree with me. I am just exploring the thoughts of faith in the context of faith in peace and is democracy a flat route of opening the road of peace to everyone?

Focusing is hard when so many people are focusing on the same thing, this is global consciousness and for some this is an obligation. I enjoy people who share the continual grace especially when they give of decent examples of leadership qualities. This is nothing about how I understand democracy. Democracy is an idea made as long ago as you like. When you find out what you like about democracy you can begin talking about the sources and branch out from there. This is a good tip if you have forgotten what it is all about. When you follow people and disconnect or they disappear you will be left with a sense of loss. You can find out more about this by searching YouTube on mind control reversal, its called morbid reality. When you have a strong sense of belonging you feel empowered, part of the collective marching on merrily down the road.

When a dream becomes reality everyone who is in that dream come to the front and celebrate in the successes. When a dream turns into a nightmare the characters in that dream out of fear or emotion become divided. Whether you believe or remember your dreams and nightmares is besides the point. My point is your unconscious thoughts can so some trains of thought say become reality.

In relation to what I am thinking right now requires an explanation of me the writer: metaphysical thoughts, sometimes focused often distracted and dip in and out of all sorts of faiths, thinking and schools of thought. I am dedicated and loyal to the cause of understanding what life is all about, why things happen and what might happen in the future. When things happen its a sense of knowing this would happen and by this time I am already on to something else. Time is strange, one minute I am now the next I am in an article from two, three, four years ago. My objective then seems to be about six months into the future. The perceptions I see happening around me are based on confusion when a six sense of being lied to comes in. I want to know who is financing things to empower or change thoughts. So a dream then becomes a nightmare in theory when the sense of fear is detected through a metaphysical sense of being lied too, if it happens to me I am sure other people have this too, I have dispraxia by the way so it won’t be all that many people.

In relation to what dreams do to people involved in politics, law and the services or armed forces. A nightmare would be less of a challenge, as a point of reference I think a nightmare would be more productive for many people. Especially when they react with less sense of emotion. Sometimes perhaps the nightmare environment is where they best thrive. The world is looking for leaders, leaders have scientifically been shown to have phycological traits that to many see as a trail of violence, a history of harsh times in which we remember them by. Lawyers follow the law but also use tactics to make a point which some may see as below the belt of truth when actual fact they know and do the job well. In this example then the winning is the restoration of the dream. The amount of times awaking from a nightmare subsides, possibly it may even be the jump that speedily creates the mornings awakening. Imagine this waking up being told what to do. Is this something worth getting used too? Perhaps this is a reality you are in and making that transition retiring from the job into relaxing and trying to transform the brains patterns of nightmare to dreams. If you job is determined by faith then again this maybe a dichotomy you either have to dip your toes in the water or immerse yourself in the fountain of promising and perhaps enjoyable democracy. Enjoyable in the notion you contributed to the reality we all share unless possessed by some niggling thought or suggestion.

In relation to what you might be thinking when reading this article I would just take a lot of what I am saying about democracy with a good grain of sea salt. More so I would ask for your contributions here on dreams and realities, nightmares and the way a nightmare can determine success or so create confusion, is something you want to change about sleep patterns. You may have some experience in the roles available and how you successfully managed to help, or identify with behaviours that on face value seem strange, but in the grand scheme of things worked out overtime really well. If you are someone of faith and want to impart your understanding of democracy again I invite you to share your blurbs as I have shared here. If you are someone of emotion struggling to understand thoughts, dreams, nightmare, realities and democracies please subscribe to this blog because I am doing my best here and with good reason will research more for you over the next few weeks.

Speakers Christopher Hitchens, Tariq Ramadan 2010 discussion about faith, Islam and Christian Peace

France is an interesting country where law and government make decisions unique in a sense to my previous point made in a earlier post about leadership. Tariq has a French accent so I assume he lives in France. In this talk he also highlights the right to criticise governments which is perhaps another French link with counter-culture. The right to protest basically.

I am not a full supporter of protest however I did like 6 million other people years ago attend the protest around London trying to make a point not to invade Iraq. I just noticed this video on YouTube watched and liked the answers each speaker said. They are both very educated, make really good points about these things and leadership is mentioned.

I like the respect of countries laws and constitutions. I have read my earlier post to a couple of friends who have given me feedback which have made me review what I said. Granted there are a few spelling mistakes as well.

At the end of the debate the live viewers of this debate asked some great questions and both speakers give really insightful answers. The feedback I got from council of friends as first am I an anarchist? To which the answer is no.

Secondly I learned that asking these questions about religion are really none of my business, so why would I want to involve myself in these sorts of debates? This debate answers and reinforces what my friend Dennis said after me reading the post out to him on the bus in Knightsbridge. Christopher brings up the example of Salman Rushdie and what happened to him after getting involved in this sort of literature. I knew this and probably why I read to to friends just to check. I even considering deleting previous post even though I felt compelled by timing that I should write such things.

Like Chris in this video recorded four years ago, I have a very short hair cut so I was well pleased to watch this debate that said I think anyone who may have read my earlier post which is a bit long and makes some humorous points about law around the world.

The second bit of feedback I got was from an Oxford luminary who pointed out that Oxford library is an amazing hub for Protestant texts for which is what my real religious background is. Again this video covers a lot of the Christian nostalgia which counterbalance where law is today.

Similarly on topic of world peace Tariq explores some great points on topic and has helped be understand some answers about philosophies and religious studies. Then there is the progression of self and an ability to respect self without drawing from history without some sort of equal balance is in every case an argument that will not end in balanced resolution of peace without some sort of rest bite.

Debate: Atheist vs Muslim (Christopher Hitchens vs Tariq Ramadan) – YouTube.

Leadership in NATO Questioning Koran

left_gatekeepersThis year we have seen european education focusing on Leadership, many of you have been educated from various backgrounds and understand what I mean. NATO has invested in new ways of understanding the world and trying to understand why the world is the way it is. NATO stands for north Atlantic treaty organisation and they take great pride when given a pat on the back when they show they have understood the new literature which is helping people evolve. The prime aim is to educate women and educate men and women on how women think. The work place has changed and more and more women are working in high executive positions where decisions have to be made. Teams working together in unison can really help companies succeed. Sometimes people will have to be disciplined and taught about new values. This temporary transition has effected the legal system. Many people are worried about the law, but since the law is changing they should not worry, they have to educate themselves. My question is this, will this transformation be as disruptive as the crusades? Also I ask how long will it take for people who have been educated in various laws around the world to become universal. Also I ask about the value of life and like NATO take a look at the persuasion techniques already in place to keep people happy and peaceful. Another question if I get time I would really love to discuss and see some people answering is where is the middle ground. Clearly there are going to be differences of opinion, many of them are already out there broadcast on YouTube. You can see how convinced people are in their knowledge of the law. But there is this defensive side showing which is quite worrying. In the 21st century there are still laws in place that are completely different to the laws and how we understand them. What you learn whilst writing and sharing about leadership are the problems you can expect and the solutions to overcoming them. The course felt more like a probing think tank. The world is looking for solutions so this is correct. And there is an element of truth to the resistance of law as we understand it. When sharing about how we dealt with situations successfully. Because it worked in the time zone the conviction for the effectiveness of how it was dealt with the opinion takes precedence in the group so everyone react but also jot down the example for future reference. Three things happened for me. I got to hear a problem in a real job in a position of leadership and how that person dealt with the situation. The thoughts they had about other members and the possible reasons that they and the rest of the class deduced about why the problem became a problem. And of course being able to come up with a solution that would in any other sense never been there. This example if documented then is adding to the think tank of actions we are seeing implemented today.

Secondly it gives a platform for people to speak. Most of the students came from what I would call really good jobs. Civil servants, leaders of big companies, all different types of cultures who had worked in other countries and it was a great platform to make friends. Each day differences of opinion would clearly show and each time something happened lots of amazing transformational diffusion happened, we each had are said because we had to and why not and we communicated through various ways. (a clear introduction of what we were doing, on the wall diagrams or lists, pen to paper, group discussions, presentations and always at the end really reflective feedback.

Thirdly I learned to find certain topics which would change me in various ways. The high end of the spectrum would be a disconnect, lack of energy and disengaged. The reasons for this would be lack of understanding and a clear understanding that new in-doctrines were being introduced. They are not new because I have tried to study them on my own over the years but never really been able to understand the practicalities in my life, which is possibly why I would want to disconnect. When put into scenarios that might pop up in the future and being pressed into stepping into the boots of a leader in this place. These new ideas or laws became appealing, the interruptions from other inquisitive people made me realise at first that what at first seems disruptive and for some people triggering, these new teachings were the fundamental cores of the new indoctrinating of the 21st century. Knowing however is half the thing creating the jobs and accepting that leaders and managers are not the only roles is my concern. Having to many chefs in the kitchen is only going to create a lot of dirty dishes and excess food being thrown away. Similarly my argument was there is already a lack of jobs, so what is the point learning leadership and management. I thought is a form of control, but then I thought about the laws being obsolete. It’s just they are not obsolete they are just bending for the new world we live in. The laws are being bent by powerful successful companies that know how to make things happen. The leadership then is a like a flat plan that anyone can open to create and explain their own company. This is appealing to employers according to the sort of jobs available, however they are looking for experience not education. This is why now the only way I can interpret what I learned on the course as yet another tick on chart of personal development. A treasured experience added to the academic curiosity about phycology, business studies, communications and speaking coherently without all the waffle.

Much of what I know is based on an amalgamation of cultures in the east and west. Much of what we are learning is also being taught in the middle east so these leaders are also facing challenges to carry out the new revelations into society. Which is where the problems come in and the same thought is applied to law. Any rewrite is going to upset the apple cart and when leaders remind the students that the laws have worked for centuries they just agree. By being taught about leadership they maybe able to snap out of this trance and disagree or simply stop putting there hand up when asked to do so.

In the context of sharia law I think this is one way imams can help teach members in the mosque. By teaching them to think for themselves and resist against the words in a book, rather listen to clear guidance and be less quick to challenge the new and accepted norms. Most good people who are educated in a way that makes them able to live comfortably, raise a family and give to the community is a good thing. If someone is always an outsider and wants to return to the land where they think they originate they should get the help they need to do this. I think you will find the same challenges are being faced everywhere. Every year pilgrims meet up and if it is anything like my experience of living in a big city they do not always get the opportunity talk about certain things and challenge norms. This is why the indoctrination that NATO has chosen is still limited, however I commend the efforts and am confident that this arena can grow, regardless of its origin, Europe, America or anywhere else. The fact is that not only does it help, it can also be applied to persons who are struggling with defending old norms and continually forcing other people into the train of thought. The tactics out there people use are fear, there has been chauvinism in the world however that has changed. I am glad women are helping doing jobs. In times of war women always chipped in. Before that women have disrupted the challenges and fears societies had. The stronger however the society the danger of the divisions. This is simply only part of pulling people up to par.

This is a gift, and most of us have accepted these gifts, I am sure you have bought your wife and children an I-pad which is a great tool from America. You can even type in Arabic just like in the Koran. Similarly the bible is available on the kindle to read. There are lots of cross references that eventually by way of persuasion make sense. Just like other scrolls from the archives. They are simply that though, archives. Imagine this everyone goes to space on a space ship to another solar system. Each person carries their faith with them from various backgrounds. People will understand the importance of these traditions, however the law of the ship will not be determined by locking people in their room for 24 hours or covering them up for the rest of the ship to see. The show must go on and people are already adapting despite what they show in a congregation. There are things people say in the group that are different when involved with a mixed tribe and any anger or inability to do the work shows. Willingness is rewarded with more responsibility. If leaders and law makers who are in power are not able to have a normal conversation about these pressing issues then will first need various things pointing out to them. If they stay stubborn and are the only ones who think they are right then they have to be taken away of this place until they can prove they have been educated again. The chances are any challenges like this will weaken their willingness to do what they think they were born to do. When this spills into how they treat families at home it is none of my business. That said the fact is I am sure behind their backs there kids are doing something completely different. Families turn a blind eye to things, but continue articulating how it is in their world and how the blessings have shaped the way they think. This thinking is a big fence. I say stop chewing corn and get out there and start speaking to the rest of the members in the democratic village.