Drafting Out Interactionism – Understanding Society

Learn from the ring leaders, they draft things out before tackling anything. If you like sociology, politics, London or communications then get on this.

Sociology as I am sure you understand is about the study of people. That is us, how we communicate, interacted and quantity information at certain times about a variety of topics.

Some of these topics are important and others not so important.

Who are you and who are you speaking too? And are you reaching the right audience.

An audience must understand your jargon to fully comprehend your message. Depending on how you use this jargon those who understand will begin to shape ideas about you by evaluating the rhetoric you consistently use. Moreover they will already have a perception about who you are depending which organisations you represent.

Human behaviour shapes citizens outlook of how they treat you face to face or by merit. If you deliver what they want to hear and offer solutions, then this is what they will expect from you. If you share common values, colours or project shared symbols they will come to you quicker.

In London we have Big Ben right next to the Houses of Parliament. When the bells ring on the hour we are also reminded of something important happening in that area.

Politics in Britain is slightly different to other countries, we have a Privie Council from all over the country who commute to London to air their constituents views to a variety of political party members. We also have to Royals which make Britain unique by proxy.

Without shaping views about politics my point is simple: In any occupation there is a hierarchy and within that structure is a selection of gentlemen and women who speak for large numbers of people.

Depending on which catchment area you live in we can make certain assumptions about who will get what. But overall the assumption should be everybody in the same position should be treated the same way. The variables differ compared to other skilled occupations.

They differ by words used in communications, body language and a culpable palpable voice sounding crucial topics that consider a variety of norms.

When politicians get this consistently right, when the bell tolls you can safely assume all will be good when they step foot into the Houses of Parliament.

If you or they start of making jokes about things there is a danger of getting treated like a comedian instead of a politician. Equally many politicians are great when the cameras are on them, which amplifies their persona to a larger audience. This creates spin offs on various shows where they will get to prove there point. Anything they miss in communications with the world will be judged. Most good politicians in the public eye I imagine have been in the system a while, kept a low profile, served their constituents well and have support of other constituencies.

The best thing about a House for Parliament is other areas get to share and adapt with similar areas therefore making society change in a logical way. The problem seems to be the convincing rhetoric and understanding of what everyone wants to hear to push a personal agenda. Personal experience is the most powerful, so with that said how can we be sure the individual at some time in there life has had to deal with something traumatic?

Trauma creates facial ticks or makes words symbolically attached with triggers that could slow a man down like a rabbit on the road. They could lose temper and nobody understands why. This could lead to being labelled madness and then be treated as such. It could also change the way mad people are seen within the group. When they leave and walk down the road to Victoria or Charing Cross and see all the homeless people they might realise they are not insane too. See how easy it is to pass a word and amplify it into something else.

When you consistently exaggerate problems people start to hear less of you. Your image will keep you in the pack. Rather than see you as an Ace or a Diamond, they will imagine you as a Joker or top Trumps.

Occupy Wall Street with Brick Overlords

As Halloween rears its pumkin head I thought it be nice to look inside the head of it. Looking through the jagged mouth, white gums and carved out eyes things are very different out there…

Overlords in this life are the people in positions of power some we see and some we cannot. As I look inside the pumpkin ball the truth becomes to count itself down to the midnight hour. The architypes are stereotypical and hold us back from understanding how it actually works out there.

History gives us hints of what might happen, polls and ratings give the overlords a template to pursuade you of how well they are doing, but we need more evidence. That’s where we come in.

Scrying has become popular during the seventies when people found spitting on mirrors made them more popular. Or the alternative they find people with extraordinary gifts. Hiring people with special claims and testimonies about the supernatural. Most people saw them as activists lobbying change or punks with spikey hair breaking norms. Some however due to their handed down ways were so old you could see it made sense.

The overlords of each country had their own entertainments. Music is very popular so lets measure this by that:

The barber shop quartets, the harpist plucking away in a room full of dikkie bows and petticoats. Then you have the bedroom DJs and musicians practising in doors away from harms way. From merrackka shaker to guitar string breaking I sure you agree there is a note for every occassion.

To the right of a piano keyboard the notes from Eyes Wide Shut play. Scientologists and ‘Mission Impossible’ stars leading roles anyone can be introduced to the overlords behind the red satin curtain.

Inside all of us is a decision to be made which bubbles up to the surface now and again. Voting, leading and sucking up to the powers that be. Choosing the softer option can exhaust anyone and families across the country sell their lemonade wares from garages.

During any recession and receding hairline we see people snuggle up, huncker down, buckle up and take their foot of the peddle. Thank goodness for the electric age, people like Elon Musk motors make good examples. Is just I wonder what the overlords will do now when they mess up, jump of a bridge or drive into a brick wall?

maltese-falcon.jpg

The Division Bell, High Hopes, The 5th Wave And Other Video’s

We all have such high hopes and standards about entertainment video’s and The 5th Wave for me was no exception. It reminded me of Pink Floyd’s Division Bell music video you can listen and watch below.

The 5th Wave is a new film out about the occupation of earth by a race known only as The Others. They came from space in a flying disc shaped space craft and over a short period of time attack the people of earth in waves.

When you watch Pink Floyd’s High Hopes video you can see similar cinematic features in The 5th Wave. The Teddy Bear and wheels both are included in the movie and the official music video. Why is this do you think?

In a classic alien film They Live we are introduced to special glasses that see the world the way it really is and the 5th Wave taps into this too. With every new film out of the same genre there is some sort of homage happening. Out of respect perhaps?

Equally object’s like the bear and wheel has symbolism hinting similar expectations and representations. The wheel is powerful symbol to adults and children as is the Teddy Bear. One is about power and the other is about coming of age. This sort of framing objects is used regularly in motion pictures.

The balloons half filled with helium also means something. The Pink Floyd video focuses on these balloons, the balloons have symbols on them, the same symbols used on PSY Op cards. These cards are like the one’s we see used to test psychic soldier’s in the film and book The Men Who Stare At Goats.

The balloons float but do not float away, they just merrily bounce down the conclave corridors. These balloons were sold for profit and did so by using less costly helium. The floating when attached with high hopes also gives clear messages about other lotherius methods used to make money out of the youth generation.

The bell is replaced by the cross. One is much heavier than the other. The bell makes a sound, the cross is wood, agar wood is known as the scent from heaven. The bell ringer Quazimodo also gave rise to the cinema. The Spanish gypsies made him the King Joker for being the ugliest man in the village and crowned him as such in front of the church gates.

The politics still exists in everything relative to the time of its initial release. Chancers who use the human resources available on the planet at any given time. We are brought up to respect our elected leaders. As indeed we are given two sides of the coin to flip.

However everything is not as simple as that. Binary opposites only create more confusion. The global consciousness is already decided according to those of any real influence. The Media splash out regardless of all the recession proofing spoke about all these years.

The division’s only weighs heavier if we allow it. Like Aristotle was were all given the same choice, carry on carrying on and pay the price or accept the lifeline when offered out to you. Why is there only 2 options do you think?

vo3.gif

Trapped (without Peace) — The Neighborhood

https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.soundcloud.com%2Ftracks%2F180085805&visual=true&color=ff5500&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false

Traps do exist, but so do escapes.

via Trapped (without Peace) — The Neighborhood

Democratic voting, offshore banking and political finger pointing

Lets just take a step back for a while please, at a time when a lot of people are pointing fingers three things stand out right of the bat.s

People are people, banking is banking and politician’s, well they’re still politician’s. You see nothing has changed and the information you see before you is nothing new.

A lot of people want you to know about stuff, they don’t care what that stuff is. Often it starts of tit for tat; whilst one side of the fields a butterfly flaps it’s wings and on the other a buffalo storms a China shop. The spicy ingredients in all of this has always been (and rightly so) a propriety secret they don’t want you to know about.

The appetite for economic destruction all began thousands of years ago before the Levellers. Landowners working for the crown took it upon themselves to create a system worthy of any family. Built on a British framework with scaffolding laid out on a scale never seen before. This rental process eaten into allsorts of funds, leaving wayfaring workers out of pocket and at times left redundant because of mismanagement and compartmentalized argument’s on a scale never seen before.

Banks have shuffled around funds for years now and there has been a lot to learn from these once effective mechanisms. Organisations outside the usual framework have been on the sideboard waiting, anticipating and try a little to help to aristocracy save cash. It’s like any other business growing by referral. One man abuses the youthful idea, has a field day so invites all his mates and business associate’s to steam in and abuse the young. Politicians and bankers have worked on your high street hand in hand for years, outsourcing and countersigning allsorts of stuff.

This week Iceland Prime Minister did the honourable thing when the lipstick on his collar was revealed. They say in democracy anyone involved in politics has skeletons in their closet. At the drop of a hat this shit on shoes is used to control or bribe leaders into doing stuff they may not necessarily do.

The secret services banks offer is nothing to get aerated about especially offshore bank’s. These sorts of accounts are outside of the crowns jurisdiction. There is allsorts of media abuse going on right now. Big Brother is treating the world like its own sensational brothel. We are naturally suspecting allsorts of things based on the smallest things.

When you look closely this is what all the big sports cars, grand flats in Vauxhall, Chelsea are all about. You find an area, steam in there, trash the place, invite in a van load of squatters from Romania in to party and spray paint previous pillars of communities. Then the rebuilding process begins an outside investor in Saudi Arabia say wants to spend millions on new flats in areas where development is taking place. Before this road diggers from all around the world ( Bulgaria etc ) steam roll in, flattern and tarmac roads, close of traffic and purposely slow things down a bit. One man works whilst the rest at and their pointing fingers. His job is more important than her job, or that job costs less long term to justify than the alternative.

Fear tactics have been around a long long time and I do not for the foreseeable future see any justice in the world that can replace bigger problems of poverty, mismoney management and the banking systems.

Best thing to do is not get caught up in all the sensationalism. Also when leaks happen I do not get impressed. There is after all nothing glamorous about rats ratting on one another. Lets face folks we live in a world of sin, where people are sinning. Most people are walking on eggshells and have had it hard one way or another so if none of the tabloid news directly affects you or your family in someway I really would not be to concerned with whats that all about.

Politics? Or just a bit of fun.

What works in one country has not fully worked in another. The variables are endless too many to mention here. I would like to address some simple considerations in today’s entry and clear up a few things. Today I am making a quick stream of consciousness about democracy, I invite you to continue with the conversations below. So here goes with some thoughts about politics and other bits of fun in relation to democracy and other peaceful matters.

For some reason I make the connection between politics and democracy and hold local politicians directly responsible for peace in the valley, so does this reinforce the idea your vote matters? In a democratic context yes, every vote counts, but when the vote is based on your own suggestions around the time of voting the thread gets a lot thinner.

How is this sort of political area measured? Imagine the wheel and tape measure going around the field measuring the circumference. Land mass in a field does not change, so why measure the same data in the field. Now take a look at voting, you vote for someone of something at a local level, all the candidates at the local level come across as an unexpected surprise. Its difficult to make out any difference between candidates and ministers. The interesting thing is candidates have faith in themselves and imply on leaflets what they believe in. The beliefs are I hope based on a true representation of who they are.

There are local faces you should recognise passing you by on the high street where you live, so voting should be like a fancy dress contest, this is a peaceful way of looking at the ballet box. Voting is not just one vote though is it, there is a first second and third place. Each candidate already has a colour creating colour bias and draws upon the success of The popular contest Crufts.

If the eye is drawn to the colour blue, when the doorbell rings you could vote for the blue like you always do, same goes for red. Its easy to undermine the colour green but people by in large, moreso now like the colour green. The thing is you cannot measure enough information to make a decision best suiting your area simply by colour. Political campaigns gather momentum from feedback and financial contributions of donors. This week in the news there has been a lot of names mentioned of donations made to people. Which is not very nice, especially when like the vote donations are made anonymously.

Democracy needs some defining before I continue. I invite you to share knowledge on what you know about democracy below, I hope to follow up on this post and continue these thoughts shortly. As I say leave some leisurely thoughts below.

robbwindow

Speakers Christopher Hitchens, Tariq Ramadan 2010 discussion about faith, Islam and Christian Peace

France is an interesting country where law and government make decisions unique in a sense to my previous point made in a earlier post about leadership. Tariq has a French accent so I assume he lives in France. In this talk he also highlights the right to criticise governments which is perhaps another French link with counter-culture. The right to protest basically.

I am not a full supporter of protest however I did like 6 million other people years ago attend the protest around London trying to make a point not to invade Iraq. I just noticed this video on YouTube watched and liked the answers each speaker said. They are both very educated, make really good points about these things and leadership is mentioned.

I like the respect of countries laws and constitutions. I have read my earlier post to a couple of friends who have given me feedback which have made me review what I said. Granted there are a few spelling mistakes as well.

At the end of the debate the live viewers of this debate asked some great questions and both speakers give really insightful answers. The feedback I got from council of friends as first am I an anarchist? To which the answer is no.

Secondly I learned that asking these questions about religion are really none of my business, so why would I want to involve myself in these sorts of debates? This debate answers and reinforces what my friend Dennis said after me reading the post out to him on the bus in Knightsbridge. Christopher brings up the example of Salman Rushdie and what happened to him after getting involved in this sort of literature. I knew this and probably why I read to to friends just to check. I even considering deleting previous post even though I felt compelled by timing that I should write such things.

Like Chris in this video recorded four years ago, I have a very short hair cut so I was well pleased to watch this debate that said I think anyone who may have read my earlier post which is a bit long and makes some humorous points about law around the world.

The second bit of feedback I got was from an Oxford luminary who pointed out that Oxford library is an amazing hub for Protestant texts for which is what my real religious background is. Again this video covers a lot of the Christian nostalgia which counterbalance where law is today.

Similarly on topic of world peace Tariq explores some great points on topic and has helped be understand some answers about philosophies and religious studies. Then there is the progression of self and an ability to respect self without drawing from history without some sort of equal balance is in every case an argument that will not end in balanced resolution of peace without some sort of rest bite.

Debate: Atheist vs Muslim (Christopher Hitchens vs Tariq Ramadan) – YouTube.

Leadership in NATO Questioning Koran

left_gatekeepersThis year we have seen european education focusing on Leadership, many of you have been educated from various backgrounds and understand what I mean. NATO has invested in new ways of understanding the world and trying to understand why the world is the way it is. NATO stands for north Atlantic treaty organisation and they take great pride when given a pat on the back when they show they have understood the new literature which is helping people evolve. The prime aim is to educate women and educate men and women on how women think. The work place has changed and more and more women are working in high executive positions where decisions have to be made. Teams working together in unison can really help companies succeed. Sometimes people will have to be disciplined and taught about new values. This temporary transition has effected the legal system. Many people are worried about the law, but since the law is changing they should not worry, they have to educate themselves. My question is this, will this transformation be as disruptive as the crusades? Also I ask how long will it take for people who have been educated in various laws around the world to become universal. Also I ask about the value of life and like NATO take a look at the persuasion techniques already in place to keep people happy and peaceful. Another question if I get time I would really love to discuss and see some people answering is where is the middle ground. Clearly there are going to be differences of opinion, many of them are already out there broadcast on YouTube. You can see how convinced people are in their knowledge of the law. But there is this defensive side showing which is quite worrying. In the 21st century there are still laws in place that are completely different to the laws and how we understand them. What you learn whilst writing and sharing about leadership are the problems you can expect and the solutions to overcoming them. The course felt more like a probing think tank. The world is looking for solutions so this is correct. And there is an element of truth to the resistance of law as we understand it. When sharing about how we dealt with situations successfully. Because it worked in the time zone the conviction for the effectiveness of how it was dealt with the opinion takes precedence in the group so everyone react but also jot down the example for future reference. Three things happened for me. I got to hear a problem in a real job in a position of leadership and how that person dealt with the situation. The thoughts they had about other members and the possible reasons that they and the rest of the class deduced about why the problem became a problem. And of course being able to come up with a solution that would in any other sense never been there. This example if documented then is adding to the think tank of actions we are seeing implemented today.

Secondly it gives a platform for people to speak. Most of the students came from what I would call really good jobs. Civil servants, leaders of big companies, all different types of cultures who had worked in other countries and it was a great platform to make friends. Each day differences of opinion would clearly show and each time something happened lots of amazing transformational diffusion happened, we each had are said because we had to and why not and we communicated through various ways. (a clear introduction of what we were doing, on the wall diagrams or lists, pen to paper, group discussions, presentations and always at the end really reflective feedback.

Thirdly I learned to find certain topics which would change me in various ways. The high end of the spectrum would be a disconnect, lack of energy and disengaged. The reasons for this would be lack of understanding and a clear understanding that new in-doctrines were being introduced. They are not new because I have tried to study them on my own over the years but never really been able to understand the practicalities in my life, which is possibly why I would want to disconnect. When put into scenarios that might pop up in the future and being pressed into stepping into the boots of a leader in this place. These new ideas or laws became appealing, the interruptions from other inquisitive people made me realise at first that what at first seems disruptive and for some people triggering, these new teachings were the fundamental cores of the new indoctrinating of the 21st century. Knowing however is half the thing creating the jobs and accepting that leaders and managers are not the only roles is my concern. Having to many chefs in the kitchen is only going to create a lot of dirty dishes and excess food being thrown away. Similarly my argument was there is already a lack of jobs, so what is the point learning leadership and management. I thought is a form of control, but then I thought about the laws being obsolete. It’s just they are not obsolete they are just bending for the new world we live in. The laws are being bent by powerful successful companies that know how to make things happen. The leadership then is a like a flat plan that anyone can open to create and explain their own company. This is appealing to employers according to the sort of jobs available, however they are looking for experience not education. This is why now the only way I can interpret what I learned on the course as yet another tick on chart of personal development. A treasured experience added to the academic curiosity about phycology, business studies, communications and speaking coherently without all the waffle.

Much of what I know is based on an amalgamation of cultures in the east and west. Much of what we are learning is also being taught in the middle east so these leaders are also facing challenges to carry out the new revelations into society. Which is where the problems come in and the same thought is applied to law. Any rewrite is going to upset the apple cart and when leaders remind the students that the laws have worked for centuries they just agree. By being taught about leadership they maybe able to snap out of this trance and disagree or simply stop putting there hand up when asked to do so.

In the context of sharia law I think this is one way imams can help teach members in the mosque. By teaching them to think for themselves and resist against the words in a book, rather listen to clear guidance and be less quick to challenge the new and accepted norms. Most good people who are educated in a way that makes them able to live comfortably, raise a family and give to the community is a good thing. If someone is always an outsider and wants to return to the land where they think they originate they should get the help they need to do this. I think you will find the same challenges are being faced everywhere. Every year pilgrims meet up and if it is anything like my experience of living in a big city they do not always get the opportunity talk about certain things and challenge norms. This is why the indoctrination that NATO has chosen is still limited, however I commend the efforts and am confident that this arena can grow, regardless of its origin, Europe, America or anywhere else. The fact is that not only does it help, it can also be applied to persons who are struggling with defending old norms and continually forcing other people into the train of thought. The tactics out there people use are fear, there has been chauvinism in the world however that has changed. I am glad women are helping doing jobs. In times of war women always chipped in. Before that women have disrupted the challenges and fears societies had. The stronger however the society the danger of the divisions. This is simply only part of pulling people up to par.

This is a gift, and most of us have accepted these gifts, I am sure you have bought your wife and children an I-pad which is a great tool from America. You can even type in Arabic just like in the Koran. Similarly the bible is available on the kindle to read. There are lots of cross references that eventually by way of persuasion make sense. Just like other scrolls from the archives. They are simply that though, archives. Imagine this everyone goes to space on a space ship to another solar system. Each person carries their faith with them from various backgrounds. People will understand the importance of these traditions, however the law of the ship will not be determined by locking people in their room for 24 hours or covering them up for the rest of the ship to see. The show must go on and people are already adapting despite what they show in a congregation. There are things people say in the group that are different when involved with a mixed tribe and any anger or inability to do the work shows. Willingness is rewarded with more responsibility. If leaders and law makers who are in power are not able to have a normal conversation about these pressing issues then will first need various things pointing out to them. If they stay stubborn and are the only ones who think they are right then they have to be taken away of this place until they can prove they have been educated again. The chances are any challenges like this will weaken their willingness to do what they think they were born to do. When this spills into how they treat families at home it is none of my business. That said the fact is I am sure behind their backs there kids are doing something completely different. Families turn a blind eye to things, but continue articulating how it is in their world and how the blessings have shaped the way they think. This thinking is a big fence. I say stop chewing corn and get out there and start speaking to the rest of the members in the democratic village.